Transformasi Otoritas Keagamaan di Era Digital: Analisis “Medium is the Message” pada Konten Youtube Shorts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/an-nashiha.v6i1.2939Keywords:
digital religion, YouTube Shorts, digital da’wah, religious authority, mediatizationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the transformation of religious messages and authority in YouTube Shorts-based da’wah content as part of the broader phenomenon of digital religious communication. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design to explore in depth the discursive practices and meaning construction within digital spaces. Data were collected through non-participant observation of YouTube Shorts content, semi-structured interviews with digital da’wah creators and audiences, and documentation including content metadata and user interactions. Informants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling techniques based on relevance and level of engagement in producing or consuming religious content.The findings reveal four main themes: (1) simplification and fragmentation of religious messages due to time constraints, (2) the dominance of algorithms in shaping content visibility and structure, (3) the shift of religious authority from knowledge-based legitimacy to digital popularity, and (4) audience interactivity in constructing collective meaning through comment sections. These findings indicate that digital media not only functions as a medium of dissemination but also actively shapes how religious messages are produced, distributed, and interpreted. In conclusion, this study highlights that the transformation of religious communication in the digital era contributes theoretically to strengthening the concepts of digital religion and mediatization, while offering practical implications for adaptive yet substantive da’wah strategies. The study also recommends enhancing digital religious literacy and conducting further cross-platform research to deepen understanding of religious dynamics in the new media era.
References
H. Campbell, Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Routledge, 2020.
R. Lohlker and S. H. Wahid, “The Transformation of Islamic Religious Authority,” Religions, vol. 17, no. 4, 2026.
B. Zaid et al., “Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 4, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/4/335
A. Rachman and T. Saumantri, “Transformation of Religious Authority in the Digital Era,” Jurnal Dakwah, 2025. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/dakwah/article/view/25644
M. H. Fuadi, “Islamic Algorithms: How Digital Platform Algorithms Shape Religious Authority,” 2025. https://proceedings.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/index.php/icresh/article/view/132
M. Masruha et al., “Digitization of Fatwas and Religious Authority,” Journal of Mujaddid, 2025. https://iesrjournal.com/index.php/jomn/article/view/421
S. A. Bano and E. Hafeez, “The Digitalization of Islam on YouTube and Youth,” Journal of History and Social Sciences, 2025. https://jhss-uok.com/index.php/JHSS/article/view/331
N. M. S. Goda, “Transformations of Identity in Short Digital Media,” Egyptian Journal of Media Research, 2025. https://ejsc.journals.ekb.eg/article_453296.html
C. Novak et al., “Religious Bubbles in a Digital Landscape,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 3, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/213
C. Fuente-Cobo and L. Gutiérrez-de-Cabiedes, “Using YouTube as a Digital Pulpit,” Church, Communication and Culture, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2174889
H. Campbell, Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. Routledge, 2020.
R. Lohlker and S. H. Wahid, “The Transformation of Islamic Religious Authority,” Religions, vol. 17, no. 4, 2026. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/17/4/493
M. Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Updated interpretations in digital context, 2020.
B. Zaid et al., “Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 4, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/4/335
S. Hjarvard, “Mediatization and Religion: Nordic Perspectives,” Nordicom Review, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-0001
C. Fuente-Cobo and L. Gutiérrez-de-Cabiedes, “Using YouTube as a Digital Pulpit,” Church, Communication and Culture, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2174889
C. Novak et al., “Religious Bubbles in a Digital Landscape,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 3, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/213
S. A. Bano and E. Hafeez, “The Digitalization of Islam on YouTube and Youth,” Journal of History and Social Sciences, 2025. https://jhss-uok.com/index.php/JHSS/article/view/331
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Sage Publications, 2021.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Sage, 2020.
M. Etikan and S. A. Bala, “Sampling and Sampling Methods,” Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, vol. 5, no. 6, 2020.
N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Sage, 2021.
L. Nowell et al., “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 19, 2020.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Sage, 2020.











