JOSH:Journal of Sharia dikelola dan diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Syariah Universitas Sunan Drajat (UNSUDA) Lamongan . Jurnal ini berisikan artikel ilmiah baik penelitian kualitatif maupun kuantitatif, dengan fokus dan Scope : Syariah, Hukum, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Keluarga Islam, Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, dan Hubungan Internasional P-ISSN : 2828-1497 E-ISSN : 2828-1012
Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia
POLITIK KEBIJAKAN PANGAN BERBASIS MAQASHID SYARIAH DI PAPUA BARAT DAYA: INTEGRASI PERAN PEREMPUAN DAN MASLAHAH PUBLIK
This article examines food policy politics in Southwest Papua Province from the perspective of Maqashid Sharia by focusing on policy orientation toward local food development and women's empowerment as integral components of promoting public welfare (maslahah ammah). As Indonesia's newest autonomous province, Southwest Papua continues to face a high dependence on food supplies from other regions, limited distribution infrastructure, and the underutilization of local food resources such as sago, taro, tubers, and marine products. These conditions indicate that the current political orientation of food policy has not fully supported regional food self-reliance or the protection of local economic actors, particularly Mama-Mama Papua, who play a strategic role in the local food economy. This study aims to analyze how the political orientation of regional food policy can be understood through the perspective of Maqashid Sharia. The research employs a qualitative method using normative juridical and public policy approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of laws and regulations, government policy documents, statistical data, and relevant scholarly literature, and were analyzed descriptively using the Maqashid Sharia framework. The findings reveal that food policy politics in Southwest Papua remains primarily oriented toward securing food supply, while strengthening local food systems, protecting the economic interests of Mama-Mama Papua, and expanding equitable market access have yet to become policy priorities. From the perspective of Maqashid Sharia, this policy orientation has not fully reflected the principles of hifzh al-nafs (the protection of life) and hifzh al-mal (the protection of wealth). The novelty of this study lies in the development of a Maqashid Sharia-based analytical framework for food policy politics that integrates support for local food and women's empowerment as indicators of maslahah ammah. These findings enrich the literature on food policy politics while providing a normative foundation for designing more inclusive, equitable, and regionally oriented food sovereignty policies
Copyright (c) 2026 JOSH: Journal of Sharia
ANALISIS STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI POLITIK MAJELIS RAKYAT PAPUA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM ASTA CITA DI PAPUA BARAT DAYA BERDASARKAN TEORI HAROLD D. LASSWELL
This study aims to analyze the political communication strategy of the Papua People's Assembly (Majelis Rakyat Papua/MRP) in implementing the ASTA CITA Program using Harold D. Lasswell's communication theory. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to explore how MRP communicates government policies to indigenous Papuan communities. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis involving MRP members, local government officials, traditional leaders, religious leaders, women representatives, youth leaders, and community members. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, while the findings were interpreted through Lasswell's five communication elements: Who, Says What, In Which Channel, To Whom, and With What Effect. The findings reveal that MRP functions as a credible political communicator by delivering policy messages through public dialogues, customary meetings, interpersonal communication, mass media, and digital platforms. The communication strategy emphasizes culturally sensitive messages that strengthen public understanding of the ASTA CITA Program, enhance policy legitimacy, and encourage community participation. Despite challenges related to geographical conditions and limited communication infrastructure in Papua, the involvement of customary and religious leaders as local communicators significantly improves message acceptance and public trust. The study concludes that the effectiveness of MRP's political communication strategy depends on the integration of communicators, messages, communication channels, target audiences, and communication outcomes within Papua's socio-cultural context. This research contributes to the development of political communication studies by demonstrating the applicability of Lasswell's communication model in analyzing policy communication strategies implemented by representative institutions in multicultural and geographically complex regions.
Copyright (c) 2025 JOSH: Journal of Sharia
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ADAT DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA: ANTARA PENGAKUAN KONSTITUSIONAL DAN IMPLEMENTASI DI PROVINSI PAPUA BARAT DAYA
From a constitutional perspective, the recognition of customary law embodies the principles of a democratic state governed by the rule of law that respects diversity. The state is obliged not only to normatively acknowledge the existence of customary law communities but also to guarantee their protection and uphold their constitutional rights. Such recognition must be realized through concrete policies, including the strengthening of customary institutions, the recognition of customary territories, the protection of customary land rights, and the inclusion of indigenous communities in all development processes affecting their lands and livelihoods. Furthermore, strengthening the enforcement of customary law in Southwest Papua is crucial, given the strategic role indigenous communities play in maintaining environmental balance and the sustainability of natural resources. The various forms of local wisdom found within indigenous communities have proven effective in preserving ecosystems and preventing the overexploitation of natural resources. Therefore, customary law should not be viewed as an obstacle to development, but rather as a strategic partner in achieving sustainable and equitable development.
GOOD GOVERNANCE, KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK, DAN DEMOKRASI LOKAL: STUDI PADA PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LAMONGAN
The implementation of good governance principles plays a crucial role in improving the quality of public policy and strengthening local democracy in the era of regional autonomy. Lamongan Regency, as one of the developing regions in East Java Province, has demonstrated various efforts to establish good governance through enhanced transparency, accountability, public participation, and innovation in public services. This study aims to analyze the implementation of good governance in the formulation and implementation of public policies and its implications for strengthening local democracy in Lamongan Regency. The research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through document analysis, observation, and examination of government policy documents and performance reports. The analysis was conducted using the perspectives of good governance, public policy, and local democracy. The findings indicate that the Lamongan Regency Government has implemented good governance principles through improved public service systems, information transparency, and community involvement in regional development planning. However, public participation in the policy-making process remains largely procedural and has not yet reached a substantive level. In addition, the influence of local political elites in policy formulation continues to pose challenges to broader public representation. The study concludes that the implementation of good governance has positively contributed to improving public policy quality and strengthening local democracy in Lamongan Regency. Nevertheless, greater efforts are needed to strengthen public participation mechanisms, enhance community capacity, and optimize transparency and accountability to foster a more inclusive, participatory, and sustainable local democracy.
BOLSA FAMILIA DALAM KERANGKA WELFARE STATE: SOLUSI KESEJAHTERAAN ATAU KEBIJAKAN MINIMALIS DI BRASIL
This study aims to analyze the Bolsa Família Program within the welfare state framework to determine whether it is more appropriately understood as a welfare solution or merely a minimalist social policy in Brazil. The study is motivated by persistent poverty and social inequality, which have prompted the government to strengthen social protection policies. This research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review of books, scholarly journals, policy documents, and reports from international organizations. The analysis is conducted using the welfare state concept and John Rawls' Theory of Justice. The findings indicate that Bolsa Família has not only contributed to reducing poverty but has also improved access to education, healthcare, and social protection for low-income households through the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) mechanism. From Rawls' perspective, the program reflects the implementation of the *difference principle* by directing redistributive benefits to the least advantaged while promoting *fair equality of opportunity* through expanded access to education and healthcare. Nevertheless, the program still faces limitations in addressing structural inequality and fostering long-term social mobility, particularly in transforming deeply rooted patterns of social and economic inequality across generations. This study concludes that Bolsa Família is better understood as a welfare instrument within the welfare state framework rather than merely a minimalist policy, as it demonstrates the state's long-term commitment to providing sustainable social protection for vulnerable groups while promoting greater social justice and more equitable opportunities.
TRANSFORMASI KELEMBAGAAN DAN SIMPLIFIKASI REGULASI DI SEKTOR PERUMAHAN UPAYA PENCAPAIAN TARGET SWASEMBADA PAPAN
The housing sector in Indonesia currently faces significant challenges due to the high housing backlog, which contrasts sharply with the government's ambitious targets for achieving housing self-sufficiency. This research aims to dissect the urgency of institutional transformation and regulatory simplification as fundamental strategies to overcome barriers in national housing provision. The primary issues identified include fragmented authority among government agencies, overlapping mandates between central and local governments, and licensing complexities that create legal uncertainty and high transaction costs for industry players. The research method employed is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Secondary data derived from legal literature and public policy are analyzed qualitatively to find solutions to bureaucratic deadlocks. The results indicate that institutional transformation through the establishment of an integrated housing authority can create more agile and focused policy orchestration. Furthermore, regulatory simplification through the harmonization of operational rules is proven to cut repetitive bureaucratic chains without compromising building quality standards. This study concludes that housing self-sufficiency can only be achieved if there is synergy between an organizational structure with strong authority and adaptive regulations. Strategic solutions offered include one-stop digital licensing and the establishment of a housing endowment fund managed by an independent body. The implementation of these policies is expected not only to accelerate the quantity of physical housing availability but also to ensure inclusivity for low-income communities. Thus, legal and institutional reforms are the primary keys to realizing a sustainable and independent national housing sector in the future.
FORMULASI DELIK MABUK DALAM KUHP BARU (UU NO. 1 TAHUN 2023) DAN QANUN ACEH NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014: SUATU KAJIAN KOMPARATIF
This research analyzes the formulation of criminal offenses related to intoxication under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the concept of jarimah syurb al-khamr in Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014 within Islamic criminal law (fiqh jinayah). This normative legal study employs statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches through library research and qualitative-descriptive analysis. The findings reveal a fundamental divergence between the two legal systems. The KUHP adopts a public order approach that criminalizes intoxication only when it causes public disturbance or endangers others, whereas the Aceh Qanun criminalizes the consumption of alcohol itself based on a moral-religious paradigm. These differences extend to the elements of the offense, evidentiary standards, and types of sanctions, fines and imprisonment under the KUHP versus flogging under the Qanun Jinayat. Nevertheless, both systems share the objective of protecting public welfare and reject the elimination of criminal responsibility for intoxicated offenders through the doctrine of actio libera in causa. This study concludes that these differences reflect weak legal pluralism and divergent punitive paradigms rather than an absolute contradiction. Therefore, national criminal law policy should consider integrating preventive principles from Islamic criminal law through stronger non-penal measures while adhering to human rights principles and the national legal framework.
ANALISIS KECENDERUNGAN GEOPOLITIK INDONESIA DALAM ORGANISASI BRICS PADA PERSPEKTIF POLITIK LUAR NEGERI BEBAS AKTIF
BRICS is an organization comprising a coalition of countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The countries in the BRICS coalition account for approximately 40% of the world’s population and hold a significant share of the global economy. Indonesia’s accession to BRICS could enhance its influence in regional dynamics and the political landscape and enable it to play a more prominent role in the global economy. However, this would inevitably clash with the concept of free and active foreign policy that Indonesia has long embraced. This study aims to analyze Indonesia’s free and active foreign policy concept, which continues to be implemented amidst the country’s growing involvement in the BRICS organization. The method employed in this study is a qualitative approach, which is understood as a means to uncover deeper meanings regarding social phenomena. The findings of this study indicate that Indonesia’s role within BRICS is viewed as a form of economic diplomacy and a short-term geopolitical strategy. Indonesia’s membership in BRICS also demonstrates an interest in expanding global influence in the economic sphere; however, by upholding the principle of a free and active foreign policy that remains non-aligned with any single nation, Indonesia maintains strategic flexibility and avoids excessive commitment to a single bloc. Therefore, Indonesia’s membership in BRICS can provide an opportunity to moderate the stance of more confrontational groups and facilitate dialogue between BRICS and Western nations.
EVALUASI PROSES PENGAJUAN LAPORAN PERKEMBANGAN STUDI PADA LAMAN BEASISWA KEMENDIKTISAINTEK ASRAMA MAHASISWA NUSANTARA (AMN) SURABAYA
This study aims to evaluate the process of submitting the Study Progress Report (Laporan Perkembangan Studi/LPS) through the Kemendiktisaintek scholarship platform at Asrama Mahasiswa Nusantara (AMN) Surabaya in order to identify supporting factors, implementation barriers, and the effectiveness of the process. The research employed a qualitative descriptive-evaluative approach using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving scholarship recipients, administrative staff, and AMN management. The findings indicate that, in the context dimension, the objectives and policies of LPS reporting were well understood by stakeholders as a mechanism for academic monitoring and a prerequisite for scholarship fund disbursement. In the input dimension, adequate internet facilities and a multi-layered mentoring system involving mentors, dormitory leaders, and administrative staff were available, although the utilization of digital guidelines remained limited. In the process dimension, several obstacles were identified, including CAPTCHA errors during login, lengthy re-verification procedures for revised documents, and difficulties in obtaining academic documents from students’ respective universities. In the product dimension, the system was found to support administrative discipline and academic progress monitoring, although its effectiveness was still affected by technical and procedural constraints. This study demonstrates that the success of digital scholarship services is determined not only by the quality of the information system but also by institutional support mechanisms and the efficiency of administrative procedures. The findings contribute to the development of digital public service evaluation, particularly in the context of higher education scholarship management. Based on the results, improvements are recommended in the CAPTCHA feature, the acceleration of revised document verification procedures, and the enhancement of socialization efforts regarding digital guidelines and complaint-handling services for students.
COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE DALAM PENGELOLAAN E-PARKIR TEPI JALAN UMUM (TJU) ZONA 1 KOTA SURABAYA
The implementation of e-parking for Public Roadside Parking (TJU) Zone 1 in Surabaya City faces challenges such as high complexity of vehicle mobility and obstacles in digital adaptation by field implementers. The success of this innovation depends not only on technological advancement but also on the collaborative synergy among the government, private sector, parking attendants, and the community. This study aims to analyze the collaborative governance process in the management of e-parking in TJU Zone 1, Surabaya City. The research utilizes a descriptive qualitative method, collecting data through interviews, observations, and documentation. Data analysis applies the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña—comprising data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing—which is then examined using Ansell and Gash's framework. The results indicate the mapping of five collaborative dimensions: (1) face-to-face dialogue was conducted through FGDs and monitoring, although information distribution remains uneven; (2) trust building was pursued through increased profit-sharing, yet some parking attendants still view digital devices as an extra workload; (3) commitment to process is demonstrated by actors consistently fulfilling their respective roles; (4) shared understanding was well achieved between the government and technology providers, but the long-term benefits are not yet fully comprehended by all parking attendants; and (5) intermediate outcomes are realized through system transparency and the availability of cashless alternatives, despite non-maximal adoption. This study recommends direct technical assistance for parking attendants to reduce technological resistance, as well as the implementation of specific campaigns/incentives for users to accelerate cashless payments
URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN REGULASI PENERIMABANTUAN IURAN BPJS KETENAGAKERJAAN BAGIPEKERJA RENTAN: PERSPEKTIF HUMAN RIGHTSBASED APPROACH
The right to social security constitutes both a fundamental human right and a constitutional right guaranteed under Article 28H paragraph (3) and Article 34 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Although the National Social Security System has been implemented, Indonesia still lacks a specific regulatory framework concerning Contribution Assistance Recipients (Penerima Bantuan Iuran/PBI) within BPJS Ketenagakerjaan for vulnerable workers. This condition reveals a regulatory gap between the National Health Insurance Program, which already provides a government-funded contribution assistance scheme, and BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, which has not established a similar mechanism for vulnerable workers. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing regulations concerning Contribution Assistance Recipients within BPJS Ketenagakerjaan from a Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) perspective. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of the legal vacuum regarding PBI BPJS Ketenagakerjaan through the HRBA framework, which positions vulnerable workers as rights holders and the state as the duty bearer responsible for ensuring the fulfillment of social security rights. The findings indicate that the absence of a PBI regulatory scheme within BPJS Ketenagakerjaan has resulted in the state's obligation to fulfill social security rights for vulnerable workers not being optimally implemented. The study further demonstrates that the vulnerable farmer protection program in Sijunjung Regency provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of contribution assistance in expanding social security coverage. Therefore, the establishment of a Government Regulation concerning Contribution Assistance Recipients within BPJS Ketenagakerjaan is necessary to provide legal certainty, expand social security coverage, and strengthen social protection for vulnerable workers.
REKONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN DI ERA DIGITAL MELALUI TATA KELOLA DIGITAL KOLABORATIF ADAPTIF
Digital transformation has become a strategic agenda in public governance reform, but various emerging approaches still tend to be partial because they separate the dimensions of institutional adaptivity, multi-actor collaboration, and the use of digital technology into different analytical frameworks. This separation creates limitations in explaining how institutions, actors, and technology interact simultaneously to generate public value in the digital era. This study aims to develop a more comprehensive conceptual framework through the Adaptive-Collaborative Digital Governance (ACDG) model to explain the relationship between institutional adaptivity, multi-actor collaboration, data integration, and public value creation. The study used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature was obtained from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases through a process of identification, screening, eligibility evaluation, and thematic synthesis of articles that met the inclusion criteria. The results show that institutional adaptivity plays a role as a foundation for digital governance transformation through policy flexibility, organizational learning capacity, and the ability to respond to change. Multi-actor collaboration serves as a transformational mechanism linking adaptive capacity with innovation and resource integration, while data interoperability serves as a strategic link enabling evidence-based decision-making. The interaction of these three dimensions generates public value, reflected in improved public service quality, transparency, accountability, public participation, and public trust. The primary contribution of this research is the development of the ACDG model, a new conceptual framework that integrates adaptive governance, collaborative governance, and digital governance perspectives into a single, cohesive model to support more adaptive, collaborative, and sustainable digital governance.
KEPENTINGAN STRATEGIS MINYAK BUMI DALAM ESKALASI KONFLIK AMERIKA SERIKAT DAN IRAN
This study discusses the strategic interests of petroleum in the escalation of conflict between the United States and Iran from the perspective of international relations. The conflict between the two countries represents one of the most complex geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, influenced not only by ideological and security issues but also by global energy interests. Iran, as one of the countries with the largest oil reserves in the world, holds a strategic position in international energy distribution, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz, which serves as a major route for global oil trade. This condition places Iran as an important actor in energy geopolitics and a central concern of United States foreign policy.This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach and utilizes library research as the primary research design. Data were collected from official documents, scientific journals, books, academic articles, and various international media sources related to the conflict between the United States and Iran. The analysis applies realism theory and an energy geopolitics approach to explain the relationship between national interests, control over energy resources, and the escalation of international conflict.The results of the study indicate that petroleum is a major factor influencing the dynamics of relations between the United States and Iran. The United States seeks to maintain its geopolitical dominance and global energy stability through various political and economic policies toward Iran, while Iran utilizes its energy resources and strategic geographical position to preserve its regional influence and national sovereignty. The conflict between the two countries demonstrates that oil is not merely an economic commodity but also a strategic political instrument in the struggle for global power. In addition to affecting the stability of the Middle East region, the US–Iran conflict also has significant implications for global energy security and the international economy
BEYOND PUNISHMENT: STRATEGI INKLUSIF DAN PEMBERDAYAAN SOSIAL DALAM PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI
Corruption eradication in Indonesia remains strongly shaped by a repressive approach centered on investigation, prosecution, imprisonment, fines, and asset recovery. Although this approach is essential for criminal accountability, recent empirical indicators show that intensive law enforcement has not fully produced a sustainable integrity system. KPK enforcement statistics, Indonesia’s 2024 Corruption Perception Index score of 37/100, and ICW’s 2024 corruption monitoring report indicate that corruption persists as a structural, institutional, and cultural problem. This article examines the limitations of a punishment-oriented approach and proposes an integrity ecosystem approach based on social empowerment, public participation, and cross-sector collaboration. This research uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The comparative scope is limited to Georgia and Finland. Georgia is analyzed through bureaucratic reform, public service transparency, digital monitoring, and civil society participation, while Finland is examined through integrity education, public trust, institutional accountability, and legal culture. The article argues that corruption eradication should not weaken criminal punishment, but should place punishment within a broader policy architecture. Social reintegration and restorative sanctions are positioned as complementary mechanisms, not substitutes for criminal liability. They include asset recovery, restitution of state losses, restrictions on public office, mandatory integrity education, anti-corruption social work, and post-sentencing monitoring. The article concludes that sustainable anti-corruption policy requires a shift from mere punishment to an integrity ecosystem involving the state, civil society, academia, media, and the private sector
PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN PEMBERDAYAAN MINUMAN TRADISIONAL BERALKOHOL DI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR: SUATU ANALISIS KEARIFAN LOKAL DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM
The regulation of traditional alcoholic beverages in East Nusa Tenggara, particularly moke and sopi, reflects a complex legal tension between cultural recognition, public health protection, law enforcement, and local economic sustainability. This article examines legal uncertainty and normative conflicts arising from the application of national alcohol control regulations, sectoral licensing rules, food safety standards, consumer protection norms, regional authority, and customary practices. The study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and prescriptive approaches. The analysis applies the theories of legal certainty, legal pluralism, and responsive regulation to assess whether the existing legal framework can provide proportional protection for traditional producers while preventing public health risks. The findings show that the current regulatory framework tends to classify traditional beverages under a general alcohol control regime without clearly distinguishing ritual use, household production, micro-commercial production, and high-risk commercial distribution. This creates legal vulnerability for small traditional producers and weakens predictable law enforcement. At the same time, cultural recognition cannot justify unregulated circulation, unsafe production, youth consumption, or harmful distribution practices. The article argues for a limited, conditional, and supervised responsive regulatory model based on local wisdom, public health standards, and legal certainty. The proposed model includes legal classification, simplified registration for traditional producers, alcohol-content testing, hygiene standards, labeling, age restrictions, collaborative supervision, proportional sanctions, and community-based economic empowerment.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PASCA LAHIRNYA KUHP NASIONAL
This research is motivated by the enactment of the National Criminal Code (KUHP), which brought about a paradigm shift in the criminal law system in Indonesia, including in the enforcement of corruption laws. The research problem focuses on how law enforcement and the principle of justice are applied in corruption crimes after the enactment of the National Criminal Code, as well as the legal obstacles that arise in its implementation. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal review of law enforcement against corruption crimes and examine the extent to which the value of justice is reflected in the application of law after the establishment of the National Criminal Code. This research uses a qualitative research method with a normative legal approach through the analysis of legislation, legal literature, and court decisions related to corruption crimes. The theories used in this research include the theory of law enforcement by Soerjono Soekanto, the theory of justice by John Rawls, and the theory of legal certainty to examine the relationship between law, justice, and the effectiveness of law enforcement. The results of the study show that the birth of the National Criminal Code provides updates in the criminal system and strengthens the principle of legality, but its implementation still faces various obstacles, such as overlapping regulations with special laws on corruption crimes, differences in interpretation by law enforcement officials, and the less than optimal application of the principle of substantive justice in the process of enforcing corruption laws in Indonesia
PEMBENTUKAN OPINI PUBLIK MELALUI INSTRAGRAM EYE.ONE.PALESTINE DALAM KONFLIK ISRAEL PALESTINA
The rapid development of social media has significantly transformed the landscape of global political communication, particularly in shaping public opinion on international conflicts. One account actively disseminating humanitarian narratives is the Instagram account Eye.one.Palestine, which consistently publishes content related to the conflict between Israel and Palestine. This study aims to analyze how the digital communication strategies employed by the account contribute to the formation of public opinion among its followers. This research applies a qualitative method with a content analysis approach, examining posts, captions, visual elements, and audience engagement patterns such as comments, likes, and shares. Data were collected through direct observation of published content within a specific period and analyzed using agenda-setting theory, framing theory, and the spiral of silence theory. The findings indicate that Eye.one.Palestine strategically utilizes emotionally compelling visuals, persuasive narratives, and targeted hashtags to cultivate empathy and solidarity toward humanitarian issues in Palestine. The framing pattern predominantly emphasizes civilian suffering, injustice, and the urgency of international support. Audience interaction intensity demonstrates the emergence of a digital discursive space that reinforces collective opinion and encourages participation in the form of symbolic support and social action. This study concludes that Instagram plays a significant role as a medium for constructing social reality in global conflicts, where non-state actors can influence public perception across national boundaries. The research contributes to the field of digital political communication and the dynamics of public opinion formation in the social media er
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU TERHADAP PELAKU UMKM ATAS PELANGGARAN TIDAK MENCANTUMKAN INFORMASI KADALUWARSA PRODUK MAKANAN
This research is motivated by the fact that many Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia still produce and sell food without including expiration date information on product packaging. This condition creates legal problems because it has the potential to harm consumers, endanger public health, and demonstrates weak supervision and law enforcement against business actors. This study aims to analyze the form of integrated law enforcement against MSMEs for violations of not including expiration information on food products and identify inhibiting factors in its implementation. The research method used is qualitative research with an empirical juridical approach. Data were obtained through observation, interviews, documentation, and literature studies, which were then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The theories used in this study include law enforcement theory, consumer protection theory, and business actor responsibility theory. The results of the study indicate that law enforcement against MSMEs is still not running optimally due to low legal awareness among business actors, lack of socialization regarding the obligation to include expiration information, and limited supervision from relevant agencies. Integrated law enforcement is carried out through guidance, supervision, the imposition of administrative sanctions, and action in accordance with statutory provisions. Therefore, synergy is needed between the government, business actors, and the community to increase legal compliance and provide maximum protection to consumers.
WANPRESTASI PERUMAHAN SYARIAH NON-BANK: URGENSI STANDARDISASI LABEL ‘SYARIAH’ MELALUI SERTIFIKASI KEPATUHAN
The marketing of Sharia labeled housing by non bank developers has grown rapidly, yet the absence of binding standards and verification for the use of the Sharia label allows compliance claims to be made on a self declared basis, creating information asymmetry and contributing to widespread developer default and consumer losses. This article examines how the normative gap in standardizing and verifying Sharia labeling in non bank Islamic housing projects increases the risk of default and consumer vulnerability, and proposes a mandatory certification model as a preventive consumer protection instrument. Employing a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study analyzes Indonesia’s consumer protection regime, the Halal Product Assurance framework, Sharia governance rules, and reported cases of default in non bank Sharia housing schemes. The findings indicate that, in practice, the Sharia label operates as a powerful compliance claim in marketing, but in the absence of enforceable auditing mechanisms it is often used without guarantees regarding project legality, contract structure, or financial capacity, thereby generating gharar, misrepresentation, and risk shifting to consumers. The article proposes a three pillar Sharia label: certification design legal verification, Sharia audit, and financial oversight, implemented by competent authorities as a prerequisite for using the Sharia label in promotion; absent such certification, Sharia claims should be treated as misleading information and unlawful advertising, subject to administrative sanctions and civil liability under the consumer protection framework
DISEMINASI TEMUAN IDENTIFIKASI SURAT SUARA TIDAK SAH DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PENDIDIKAN PEMILIH PADA PEMILUKADA KABUPATEN WONOGIRI TAHUN 2024
The 2024 simultaneous regional elections (Pilkada) represent a crucial milestone in Indonesia's democratization process, including in Wonogiri Regency, which is holding elections for the Governor and Deputy Governor of Central Java, as well as for the Regent and Deputy Regent. A crucial aspect in maintaining the integrity and legitimacy of elections is the validity of ballot papers. Invalid ballots often indicate problems with voter literacy, voting techniques, and the distribution of information related to voting procedures. This study aims to disseminate the results of the identification of invalid ballots in both elections, focusing on their categories, causes, and implications for the quality of local democracy. The method used was a qualitative descriptive analysis utilizing primary data from vote counting results at polling stations (TPS) and interviews with election organizers at the sub-district and village levels. The identification results showed that invalid ballots were generally caused by three main factors: technical errors by voters in voting (for example, marking more than one column), intolerable physical damage to the ballots, and forms of political protest through deliberate blanking or scribbling. Interesting findings indicate a correlation between voter education level and the number of invalid ballots, as well as significant differences between sub-districts. Disseminating the results of this study is crucial for providing input to the General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Elections Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) in designing more effective voter education strategies. Furthermore, the findings of this study are expected to raise public awareness regarding the importance of understanding proper voting procedures. Thus, efforts to reduce the number of invalid ballots can contribute to improving the quality of democracy, transparency, and accountability of election administration in Wonogiri Regency in particular and Indonesia in general.
URGENSI PENALARAN DAN PENEMUAN HUKUM BAGI PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA DIKABUPATEN NIAS UTARA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KOPERASI DESA MERAH PUTIH.
The establishment and development of the Merah Putih Village Cooperative (KDMP) in North Nias Regency requires sound legal reasoning and legal research from local State Administration (TUN) officials. This study aims to analyze the urgency of legal reasoning and legal research for TUN officials in supporting the establishment and development of the KDMP. The research method used combines normative-empirical methods with qualitative and legal analysis, along with case study and literature approaches. The results indicate that legal reasoning and legal research are crucial for TUN officials to create legal certainty, reduce conflict, increase accountability, and overcome legal difficulties in establishing and developing the KDMP in the village.
Otonomi Daerah, Kebijakan Publik, dan Penguatan Demokrasi Lokal di Kabupaten Lamongan
Regional autonomy in Lamongan Regency plays a very important role in strengthening local democracy and ensuring that the resulting public policies are responsive to the needs of the community. In this context, the active participation of the community in the policy-making process is the key to achieving the goal of effective and sustainable regional autonomy. Strengthening the capacity of local governments, along with community involvement in decision-making, is indispensable to achieve equitable and sustainable development. The successful implementation of regional autonomy in Lamongan Regency is expected to be a model for other regions in increasing community participation and the quality of public services. Collaboration between local governments and communities not only strengthens regional autonomy, but also supports sustainable development throughout Indonesia. Aspects of transparency and accountability that are improved through effective regional autonomy are important factors in creating good governance. The research methods used in this study include a qualitative descriptive approach to explore the dynamics of community participation and the effectiveness of regional autonomy policies in Lamongan Regency. This study aims to analyze how community participation can increase the effectiveness of regional autonomy policies and support sustainable development in Lamongan Regency. . The efficient application of information technology will strengthen participatory planning practices and encourage community involvement in every stage of development. Therefore, strengthening community capacity through training and socialization of information technology is an important step to achieve more effective and sustainable regional autonomy in Lamongan Regency
Fast Track Legislation from the Perspective of People's Sovereignty: Criticism of the Weakening of Public Participation in the Legislative Process
This article examines the practice of fast-track legislation in the formation of laws in Indonesia from the perspective of popular sovereignty and democratic constitutionalism. This study aims to analyze how accelerated legislation affects the quality of public participation in lawmaking. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislative, conceptual, and constitutional approach. A literature review was used to collect primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the fast-track legislation mechanism has led to technocratic legislative practices characterized by difficulty in accessing supporting documents (academic papers and draft bills) and limited space for deliberation, causing the substantive legitimacy of laws to be increasingly eroded. Strengthening participation through amendments to Article 96 of Law No. 12 of 2011 through Law No. 13 of 2022 by adopting the concept of meaningful participation as formulated by the Constitutional Court in Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 has proven unable to minimize the impact of fast-track legislation. -track legislation. This article concludes that the constitutional limits of fast-track legislation lie in the fulfillment of public legitimacy, which can only be achieved through meaningful participation. Therefore, strict regulations regarding time limits for the formation of laws and meaningful participation mechanisms are necessary to prevent tokenistic legislation that contradicts the principle of people's sovereignty.
PENERAPAN SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF TERHADAP RUMAH SAKIT PELAKU FRAUD KLAIM JKN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KESEHATAN
Fraudulent claims in Indonesia’s National Health Insurance (JKN) pose a serious threat to financial sustainability and quality of healthcare services. Hospitals, as referral healthcare providers, are highly vulnerable to fraudulent practices such as upcoding, phantom billing, and diagnosis manipulation. This study analyzes the regulation and effectiveness of administrative sanctions imposed on hospitals committing JKN claim fraud from a health law perspective. Using a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this study finds that although administrative sanctions are normatively regulated, their implementation remains ineffective in creating deterrence and legal certainty. Sanctions tend to be formalistic and weakly enforced due to limited supervision and inter-institutional coordination. Strengthening regulations, supervision systems, and sanction standards is therefore essential to ensure legal protection and sustainability of JKN
STUDI SOSIOLOGIS ATAS KASUS-KASUS HUKUM YANG VIRAL (NO VIRAL, NO JUSTICE)
The "No Viral, No Justice" phenomenon reflects the dependence of law enforcement in Indonesia on social media pressure, which increases accountability yet risks undermining judicial objectivity. This qualitative research, employing a legal sociology approach, utilizes documentation studies and digital observations of literature and social media narratives to analyze the interaction between public opinion and the institutional responses of law enforcement agencies through interactive model data analysis techniques. Sociologically, the "No Viral, No Justice" phenomenon and the practice of trial by social media serve as digital social control instruments that enhance transparency and official accountability; however, juridically, they pose a risk to judicial objectivity and individual rights. Therefore, a balance between public oversight and adherence to formal legal procedures is essential to ensure that justice does not become ensnared in emotional digital populism.
KONSTRUKSI NORMA DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBUANGAN SAMPAH SEMBARANGAN DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG
The waste problem in Bandung Regency is becoming increasingly alarming along with the rising volume of waste, while the behavior of littering still often occurs and impacts the environment, health, and social life of the community. This situation reflects a discrepancy between the normative provisions in Article 5 of Law Number 18 of 2008 on Waste Management and the practice of law enforcement in the field. Therefore, this study is important to examine regulations as well as the role of law enforcement in waste management in Bandung Regency. The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulatory framework regarding obligations, prohibitions, and sanctions in efforts to prevent littering, as well as to examine the law enforcement against such violations in Bandung Regency. The research method used is a normative legal approach with secondary data collected through literature studies and analyzed using qualitative data processing techniques. Based on the research results, Bandung Regency Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022 on Waste Management has established obligations, prohibitions, and criminal sanctions, but it has not yet regulated preventive administrative sanctions. The law enforcement orientation that focuses more on criminalization reduces the effectiveness of prevention and is not in accordance with the principle of ultimum remedium, thus conflicting with Article 5 of Law Number 18 of 2008 on Waste Management. Waste law enforcement in Bandung Regency still faces various obstacles, including the limited number of civil service investigators and a handling pattern that is more reactive than preventive. The stagnation of enforcement amid increasing waste generation has weakened the function of the law as a means of prevention and deterrence.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIOLOGI HUKUM
Law enforcement is a very essential and substantial aspect in the concept of a state based on law, such as in Indonesia. This is because one of the elements to create or restore balance in the social order is law enforcement. The type of research used in this legal study is normative legal research (doctrinal research). Normative legal research is research based on legal materials (library based) that focuses on reading and studying primary and secondary legal materials. Thus, in legal research conducted to produce new theories, arguments, or concepts as prescriptions to solve the problems faced, the answers are whether they are right, inappropriate, or wrong. This research shows that law is considered effective if it aligns with the regulations established in legislation and meets societal expectations; as a result, the presence of such law can achieve social order within the community.
KEPAILITAN SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENGEMBALIAN KEKAYAAN: STUDI LITERATUR TERHADAP HUKUM KEPAILITAN DI INDONESIA
Bankruptcy is a legal instrument designed to collectively resolve debt disputes through a mechanism for managing and liquidating the assets of bankrupt debtors. Normatively, bankruptcy law in Indonesia aims to ensure the return of bankrupt debtors' assets to creditors in a fair, proportional, and legal manner. However, in practice, the effectiveness of bankruptcy as an asset recovery instrument still faces various obstacles. This study aims to analyze bankruptcy as an asset recovery instrument from the perspective of bankruptcy law in Indonesia and identify gaps between normative objectives and its implementation in practice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a literature review approach, through an examination of relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and previous research findings. The results indicate that although bankruptcy law has a comprehensive normative framework, the effectiveness of asset recovery in bankrupt debtors is still hampered by legal and non-legal factors, such as asset complexity, limited asset tracing, curator professionalism, and inconsistent judicial practices. Therefore, strengthening the implementation of bankruptcy law is necessary so that it can function optimally as a creditor protection instrument and support a healthy business climate.
A BRIEF REVIEW OF SIYASAH SYAR'IYYAH’S PRINCIPLES ON REASONS FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SINJAI REGENT REGULATION NUMBER 60 OF 2023 CONCERNING THE PARTICIPATION OF VILLAGE HEADS AND VILLAGE OFFICIALS IN THE BPJS HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
This study aims to discuss a brief review based on the principles of syar'iyyah politics regarding the reasons for the amendment to Sinjai Regent Regulation Number 60 of 2023 concerning BPJS Health membership for village heads and village officials. This study is a qualitative study. The research design is field research. The supporting informants in this study consisted of the Head, Secretary, and Staff of Bonto Village, Sinjai Tengah District, Sinjai Regency, the Head of the Village Administration Division of the Sinjai Regency Community and Village Empowerment Office, and the Head of the Legal and Human Rights Division of the Sinjai Regency Secretariat. The results of this study show that the legal, philosophical, and sociological reasons for the amendment of Sinjai Regent Regulation No. 19 of 2021 to No. 60 of 2023 are in line with the principles of siyasah syar'iyyah. Among the reasons considered to be in line with these principles is the simplification of administration, which previously caused difficulties for village officials and even resulted in delays in the payment of BPJS Health contributions for village officials, ultimately leading to some village officials not receiving health services from BPJS. However, the implications of this regulation still show inconsistencies with the principles of Siyasah Syar'iyyah. For example, there is a discrepancy with the principle of public interest, because if one village is late in uploading data, other villages are also affected, namely the system immediately experiences congestion. Health services for all village officials are also hampered. This also shows a discrepancy with the principle of justice, because there is unfair treatment of village officials who upload data on time.
OPINI PUBLIK SEBAGAI FAKTOR PEMBENTUK DISKRESI APARAT DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM: ANALISIS SOSIOLOGI HUKUM
This study analyzes the role of public opinion in shaping the exercise of discretion by law enforcement officers in Indonesia. From a sociological law perspective, law is understood as a social institution that interacts with society, where public opinion can influence the legitimacy and practice of law enforcement. The phenomenon of penal populismindicates that public pressure often drives officers to make symbolic legal decisions, potentially blurring the normative boundaries of discretion. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, and analyzing legal documents and media reports. Thematic analysis is applied to explore the interaction between public opinion, penal populism, and officers’ discretion. Findings reveal that public opinion significantly affects the use of discretion, both directly and through the dynamics of penal populism. Discretion exercised professionally and based on legal principles enhances public trust, while distortion due to social pressure creates disparities and perceptions of injustice. This article emphasizes the importance of balancing responsiveness to public opinion with adherence to legal principles, as well as the need for accountability mechanisms and ethical training for law enforcement officers. The findings contribute to the development of sociological law studies and contemporary law enforcement practices.