Analisis Perbandingan Gadai Syariah dan Gadai Konvensional di Tinjau Hukum dan Prinsip
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/ekis.v5i2.86Keywords:
Sharia Pawn (Rahn), Conventional PawnAbstract
Pawn is a right acquired by an individual who owes a movable property, which is handed over to them by a debtor or a representative, granting the debtor the authority to receive payment for the goods in advance compared to other debtors, excluding auction costs and salvage expenses. Sharia pawning (known as Rahn) involves using one of the borrower's assets as collateral for the loan they receive. This study seeks to establish a comparison between conventional pawning and sharia pawning (rahn). The research aims to provide insights and understanding to all relevant parties regarding the comparative aspects of conventional pawning and sharia pawning (rahn). The research methodology employed is library research, utilizing data collection techniques such as gathering books, journals, and previous works related to conventional pawning and sharia pawning (rahn). The researcher employs qualitative data analysis for data interpretation. Based on the described research, it can be concluded that both conventional pawns and sharia pawns share similarities in that they are prohibited from exploiting the pawned goods, and the pawnee has the right to sell or auction the pawned goods once the loan period expires. The distinction between conventional pawning and sharia pawning lies in the legal foundation. Conventional pawning relies on the Criminal Code, while sharia pawning is guided by the DSN MUI Fatwa on Rahn. In conventional pawning, the contract involves a single debt agreement with a movable goods guarantee from a conventional legal perspective. The Ministry of SOEs oversees conventional pawning, while the Sharia Supervisory Agency (BPS) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) oversee sharia pawning. Conventional pawns involve interest charges, whereas sharia pawns incur maintenance costs. In conventional pawning, pawned goods can be auctioned, while in sharia pawning, they can be sold.
Downloads
References
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Gadai Syariah di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2005), hlm.102.
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Gadai Syariah di Indonesia, hlm.120.
Andri Soemitra, Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2010), hlm.389.
Andri Soemitra, Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah, hlm.388.
Chuzaimah T. Yanggo, Hafiz Anshory, Problematika Hukum Islam Kontemporer (Jakarta, 2004), hlm.79.
Eli Suryani, “Pegadaian Syari’ah: (Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia,” AI-Hurriyah Vol.
, no. No. 1 (Juni 2009): hlm. 22.
Eris Tri Kurniawati, “Analisis Pengaruh Transaksi Gadai Emas Terhadap Tingkat Keuntungan Bank Syariah,” Ekonomika-Bisnis Vol. 4, no. No. 1 (Januari 2013), hlm. 45.
Jery Tarantang, et all, Regulasi dan Implementasi Pegadaian Syariah di Indonesia (K-Media, 2019), hlm.4.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 1150,
Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES) Buku II Bab XIII tentang Rahn,
M. Sholikul Hadi, Penggadaian Syari’ah (Jakarta: Salemba Diniyah, 2003), hlm. 3
Siti Suhaina, “Perbandingan Hukum Gadai Syariah dengan Gadai Konvensional pada PT. Pegadaian Pekanbaru,” JOM Fakultas Hukum Vol. III, no. No. 2 (Oktober 2016): hlm.9.
Sri Dewi Anggadini. “Penerapan Teori Dan Aplikasi Penggadaian Syariah Pada Perum Penggadaian Di Indonesia.” Majalah IImiah UNIKOM Vol. 15, no. No. 1 (t.t.).
Subekti. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 1996. Surepno, “Studi Implementasi akad Rahn (Gadai Syariah) Pada Lembaga Keuangan,”
Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law Vol.1 (2018): hlm.183.
Zuhriati Khalid. Pelaksanaan Gadai Konvensional Dan Gadai Syariah (Studi Pada PT. Pegadaian Cabang Gaharu Medan Dan PT.Pegadaian Syariah Cabang Setia Budi Medan, t.t.
