OPINI PUBLIK SEBAGAI FAKTOR PEMBENTUK DISKRESI APARAT DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM: ANALISIS SOSIOLOGI HUKUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v5i01.2648Keywords:
public opinion, officer discretion, penal populismAbstract
This study analyzes the role of public opinion in shaping the exercise of discretion by law enforcement officers in Indonesia. From a sociological law perspective, law is understood as a social institution that interacts with society, where public opinion can influence the legitimacy and practice of law enforcement. The phenomenon of penal populismindicates that public pressure often drives officers to make symbolic legal decisions, potentially blurring the normative boundaries of discretion. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, and analyzing legal documents and media reports. Thematic analysis is applied to explore the interaction between public opinion, penal populism, and officers’ discretion. Findings reveal that public opinion significantly affects the use of discretion, both directly and through the dynamics of penal populism. Discretion exercised professionally and based on legal principles enhances public trust, while distortion due to social pressure creates disparities and perceptions of injustice. This article emphasizes the importance of balancing responsiveness to public opinion with adherence to legal principles, as well as the need for accountability mechanisms and ethical training for law enforcement officers. The findings contribute to the development of sociological law studies and contemporary law enforcement practices.
References
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Butt, P., & Lindsey, T. (2018). The governance of criminal justice: Balancing discretion and accountability. Routledge.
Cotterrell, R. (2017). Sociology of law: Visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, K. (2019). Discretionary justice: The sociology of criminal law enforcement. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, L. M. (2001). Law in the changing society. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
Lacey, N. (2018). Criminal justice, penal populism, and the challenges of discretion. Routledge.
Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2011). Public criminology? Social research and political engagement. Routledge.
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mietzner, M. (2020). Populism, media, and criminal justice: Comparative perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pangestu, A. (2020). Diskresi Kepolisian dalam penanganan amuk massa dan KDRT di Indonesia. Jurnal Administratum. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/10258
Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. Routledge.
Pratt, J., & Miao, P. (2017). Penal populism in comparative perspective. Punishment & Society, 19(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517721826
Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ramadhan, F. (2019). Penggunaan diskresi dalam penanganan tindak pidana narkotika di Kepolisian Resor Bulukumba. Al-Devana Journal. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/aldev/article/view/35336

















