TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PASCA LAHIRNYA KUHP NASIONAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v5i02.2921Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Corruption, JusticeAbstract
This research is motivated by the enactment of the National Criminal Code (KUHP), which brought about a paradigm shift in the criminal law system in Indonesia, including in the enforcement of corruption laws. The research problem focuses on how law enforcement and the principle of justice are applied in corruption crimes after the enactment of the National Criminal Code, as well as the legal obstacles that arise in its implementation. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal review of law enforcement against corruption crimes and examine the extent to which the value of justice is reflected in the application of law after the establishment of the National Criminal Code. This research uses a qualitative research method with a normative legal approach through the analysis of legislation, legal literature, and court decisions related to corruption crimes. The theories used in this research include the theory of law enforcement by Soerjono Soekanto, the theory of justice by John Rawls, and the theory of legal certainty to examine the relationship between law, justice, and the effectiveness of law enforcement. The results of the study show that the birth of the National Criminal Code provides updates in the criminal system and strengthens the principle of legality, but its implementation still faces various obstacles, such as overlapping regulations with special laws on corruption crimes, differences in interpretation by law enforcement officials, and the less than optimal application of the principle of substantive justice in the process of enforcing corruption laws in Indonesia
References
Atmasasmita, Romli. Hukum Kejahatan Bisnis: Teori Dan Praktik Di Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Hafidz Arsyad, Jawadal. Korupsi Dalam Perspektif HAN. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Jasman, Panjaitan. “Politik Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dalam Memberi Kewenangan Kepada Jaksa Agung Untuk Melakukan Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Yang Sudah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap.” Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjajaran (Bandung), 2014, 55.
Kansil. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1986.
Mudzakir. “Posisi Hukum Korban Kejahatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Universitas Indonesia, 2001.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Panjaitan, Marojahan JS. “Penyelesaian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Negara Menurut Hukum Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum 24, no. 3 (July 2017): 444.
———. “Pertanggungjawaban Kerugian Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara.” October 24, 2017, hlm. 166 s.d 167. https://doi.org/10.20885/justum.vol24.iss3.art5.
Tanak, Johannis. “Tindak Diskresi yang menimbulkan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana.” TUN Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Waluyo, Bambang. Viktimologi: Perlindungan Korban Dan Saksi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
