Politik Transaksional dan Pragmatisme Masyarakat Dalam Demokrasi Modern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v3i01.819Keywords:
Democracy, Transactional,, PragmatismAbstract
Democracy is a political concept that is widely used by many countries in the world today. Ideas about people's welfare are the main focus in the concept of political order in democracy. So the term democracy has become familiar to hear today. On the other hand, transactional politics is something that is often found in democracy implemented in Indonesia. This also sparked an act of political pragmatism in Indonesian society. So democracy experiences a shift in its agenda which has an impact on the quality of democracy itself. The research method used in this paper is qualitative research using a social science approach that has developed with today's modern political sciences. We also use research libraries to make it easier for us to manage data that we find and that we consider relevant. These transactional political actions are related to the attitude of the main political interest in the form of power, while the culture of political pragmatism in Indonesian society is more visible due to the relatively low level of education in Indonesian society.
References
Hadiwinata, B. S. (2005). Civil Society: Pembangun dan Sekaligus Perusak Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(1), 1-22.
Nabila, N., Prananingtyas, P., & Azhar, M. (2020). Pengaruh money politic dalam pemilihan anggota legislatif terhadap keberlangsungan demokrasi di indonesia. Notarius, 13(1), 138-153.
Liata, N. (2020). Relasi pertukaran sosial antara masyarakat dan partai politik. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI), 1(1), 79-95.
H.M. Abdul Kholiq, Perilaku Politik Transaksional (Menggagas Fenomena Praktek Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu), h. 86. http://manarulquran.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/manarul/article/view/15. (Diakses 10 januari 2024).
Solihah, R. (2016). Politik transaksional dalam pilkada serentak dan implikasinya bagi pemerintahan daerah di Indonesia. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 2(1), 97-109.
MARETHA, T. A. (2020). POLITIK TRANSAKSIONAL DAN RASIONALITAS PEMILIH DALAM PILPRES 2019 DI KECAMATAN KARANGNUNGGAL (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Siliwangi).
Djauhari.2011.”Problematika Pemilihan Kepala DaerahSecara Langsung (Dalam perspektif Sosiologis)”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 11 Edisi Khusus Februari 2011.Fitriyah.2012. “Fenomena Politik Uang dalam Pilkada”.Jurnal Politik Vol. 3, No. 1 April 2012.
Ghifari, M. S., & Sari, C. M. A. (2019). PRAKTIK POLITIK TRANSAKSIONAL PADA SISTEM DESENTRALISASI ASIMETRIS DI ACEH (Studi Analisis 10 Tahun Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Periode 2008/2018). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial & Ilmu Politik, 4(3).
Pagala, H. A., & SHI, M. (2021). Politik Transaksional. Bening Media Publishing. Hal.45-47
AAGN Ari Dwipayana, “Demokrasi Biaya Tinggi. Dimensi Ekonomi Dalam Demokrasi Elektoral di Indonesia Pascar Orde Baru”, Jurnal FISIPOL UGM, Vol. 12 No. (3 Maret 2009), h. 267.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/10971. (Diakses (12 Agustus 2018). Lihat juga. Agus Rahardjo, “Biaya Politik Tinggi Penyebab Demokrasi ransaksional”
Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiy, Koleksi Hadis Hukum, Juz IX (Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2001), h. 457-459.Sumartono, S. (2018). Budaya Politik Dalam Masyarakat Pragmatis. LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(1), 20-26.
Plano, Jack C., Riggs, Robert E. dan Robin, Helena S.n1985. Kamus Analisa Politik. Jakarta. Rajawali Press hal 51-53
Almond, Gabriel A. dan Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: The Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. hal.90-92
Noor, F. (2016). Perilaku politik pragmatis dalam Kehidupan politik Kontemporer: Kajian atas menyurutnya peran ideologi politik di Era reformasi. Masyarakat Indonesia, 40(1), 57-74.
Jackson, Karl D, 1978. The Political Implications of Structure and Culture in Indonesia, California : University of California hal. 67-68
