| .: e-ISSN 2828-1810 :. |
 |
| .: p-ISSN 2828-1918 :. |
 |
| .: Kebijakan & Prosedur :. |
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewer |
| Focus & Scope |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Ethics |
| Author Guidelines |
| Copyright &License |
| Open Access Policy |
| Plagiarism Policy |
| Publication Fees |
| Contact |
| .: Information :. |
| For Readers |
| For Authors |
| For Librarians |
| .: Alat Bantu :. |
 |
 |
| .: Indeksasi :. |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| .: Komunitas :. |
 |
 |
| .: Template :. |
 |
 |
| .: Visitor :. |
|
|
Peer Review Process
English :
Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by the Editorial Board. Then, the article independently reviewed by two peer reviewers and will go to the next selection through a Double-blind Peer-Review Process. Decisions from reviewers are a top priority for editors to make decisions. The time required by reviewers to complete a round review process is twoweeks. Generally, prospective reviewers will be selected based on their reputation in the suitability of their expertise. The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based on their reports/recommendation. If the manuscript is accepted, the process goes to the editing phase before the final publication process.
Indonesia:
Setiap artikel yang masuk ke redaksi akan diseleksi melalui proses Initial Review oleh Dewan Redaksi. Kemudian, artikel tersebut direview secara independen oleh dua peer reviewer dan akan masuk ke tahap seleksi selanjutnya melalui Proses Double-blind Peer-Review. Keputusan dari reviewer merupakan prioritas utama bagi editor dalam mengambil keputusan. Waktu yang dibutuhkan reviewer untuk menyelesaikan proses round review adalah dua minggu. Umumnya, calon reviewer akan diseleksi berdasarkan reputasi dan kesesuaian keahliannya. Keputusan untuk publikasi, amandemen, atau penolakan didasarkan pada laporan/rekomendasi mereka. Jika naskah diterima, proses selanjutnya masuk ke tahap editing sebelum proses publikasi final.
