Education Quality Management in Improving User Services at Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah Miftahul Jannah Sekampung, East Lampung, Lampung

Authors

  • Tukiran Institut Teknologi Sumatera (ITERA), Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v5i1.25

Keywords:

Education Quality, Management, Improving User Services, Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah

Abstract

The quality of education can be seen from the management in every institution or institution, especially in schools or madrasas. Departing from how the quality of education in a school or madrasa seen from the service users who in the future can improve the quality of education.This research is included in the field qualitative research. Data collection techniques used are: interview method, observation method and documentation method. The data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis. The process of qualitative data analysis according to Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman, through the process of data reduction, display (presentation of data) and verification. The results showed that madrasah ibtidayyah miftahul janah had a good quality of education which could be seen in school management in improving the quality of users which consisted of four aspects including; 1) Aspects of Physical Evidence (tangibles), 2) Aspects of Empathy, 3) Aspects of Reliability, and 4) Aspects of Responsiveness.

References

Abdul Hadis dan Nurhayati, Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2010

Abudi Nata, Manajemen Pendidikan, Jakarta Timur, Prenada Setia, 2003

Al-Thabrani, Mu’jam al-Kabir, juz 6, Mauqi’u al-Islam Dalam Software Maktabah Syamilah, 2005.

Artikel Pendidikan, Konsep Dasar MPMBM, http: www.dikdasmen.depdiknas.go.id

Ary bogdan, RC And Bihlen, Qualitative Research For Education An Introduction to Theory and Methods, London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc, 1982

Charles Hoy, dkk., Improving Quality in Education, London: Kogan Page, 2000

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Informasi tentang Bantuan Operasional Manajemen Mutu (BOMM) untuk Sekolah Menengah Umum. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum. 2002

Edwar Sallis, Total Quality Management in Education, Yogyakarta: Irlisod, 2010), cet.IX

Fandy Tjiptono & Gregorius Chandra. Service, Quality & Satisfaction, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2012

Kae H. Chung dan Leon C. Magginson, Organizational Behavior : Developing Managerial Skills New York : Harper and Row Publisher, 2001

Kotler, P. Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Internasional, Inc.2002

Margaretha, Measuring Costumer Satisfaction, Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003

Nasanius,Y. Kemerosotan Pendidikan Kita, Guru dan Siswa yang berperan besar Bukan Kurikulum, dalam http://www.suarapembaharuan. com

Rohiat, Manajemen Sekolah Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Refika Adithama, 2009.

Sindhunata (Ed). Menggagas Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Demokrasi, Otonomi, Civil Society, Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2000

Stephen P. Robbins dan Timothy A. Judge, Organizational Behavior, 12nd ed. New Jersey : Pearson Education, 2005

Suryadi, Manajemen Mutu Berbasis Sekolah Konsep dan Aplikasi, Bandung: Sarana Panca Karya Nusa, 2009

Tjiptono, F., dan Diana, A. Total Quality Management. Yogyakarta: Andi. 2003

Usman Nasir, Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Melalui Administrasi Pendidikan, Kuala: Universitas Syiah, 1998

Usman Sunyoto. Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2004

ValarieA. ZeithamI, Leonard L Berry, & A. Parasuraman, The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality Journal of Marketing Vol. 60-April 1996

Zamroni, Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah, Jakarta: PSAP Muhamadiyah, 2007

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01