Self-Efficacy as a Mediator of Leadership, Learning Organization, Motivation, and Teachers’ Innovative Behavior

Authors

  • Fenti Farleni Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Syadeli Hanafi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Dase Erwin Juansah Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v8i2.3026

Keywords:

Innovative Teacher Behavior, Learning Organization, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Transformational Leadership

Abstract

This study examines the uneven development of innovative behavior among public elementary school teachers in responding to changing learning demands. It aims to analyze the direct effects of transformational leadership, learning organization, motivation, and self-efficacy on teachers’ innovative behavior and to test the mediating role of self-efficacy. A quantitative explanatory design was employed. Data were collected through a closed-ended Likert-scale questionnaire administered to 374 public elementary school teachers in Serang Regency, selected through proportional stratified sampling from a population of 5,645 teachers. Hypotheses were tested using Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares. The findings show that transformational leadership, learning organization, motivation, and self-efficacy positively affect teachers’ innovative behavior. The three exogenous variables also positively influence self-efficacy. Self-efficacy emerged as the strongest predictor and partially mediated all indirect relationships. These results contribute to educational management by emphasizing the importance of strengthening teachers’ professional confidence in developing school innovation.

References

Adhinugraha, R. B. A., Hardhienata, S., Sunaryo, W., Zaini, A. W., & Rozi, M. F. (2024). Transformative strategies to enhance teacher innovativeness: Addressing challenges through strengthening organizational culture, transformational leadership, self-efficacy, and achievement motivation. Managere: Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 6(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.52627/managere.v6i2.520

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Bao, Y. (2024). The effect of principal transformational leadership on teacher innovative behavior: The moderator role of uncertainty avoidance and the mediated role of the sense of meaning at work. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1378615. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378615

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Serang. (2023). Data evaluasi inovasi guru sekolah negeri Kabupaten Serang.

Dumbi, K. S., & Indrasari, S. Y. (2024). Predictor factors for teacher innovative behavior during curriculum reform: The role of cognitive flexibility, positive affect, and negative affect. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i2.72081

Febriyanti, C., Suharyati, H., & Sunaryo, W. (2025). Strategies to increase teacher innovativeness through strengthening learning organisation, creativity, self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i1.5675

Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., … Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892

Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teachers’ innovative work behavior as a function of self-efficacy, burnout, and irrational beliefs: A structural equation model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020030

Hair, Joe F, Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLSSEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (2) pages 139-152, doi: 10.2753. MTP1069-6679190202. https://doi.org/10.2753/ MTP1069-6679190202. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sar

Hair, Joseph F, Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2024). Teacher innovativeness: The effect of self-efficacy, transformational leadership, and school climate. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202424547

Hosseini, S., & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1869364. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364

Huang, M., Mansor, A. N., Kamaruzaman, F. M., & Xue, Y. (2026). The role of innovative work behavior and teacher self-efficacy in shaping educational innovation: a systematic literature review. Discover Education, 5(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01265-8

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Li, X., Pei, X., & Zhao, J. (2025). Intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as pathways to innovative teaching: A mixed-methods study of faculty in Chinese higher education. BMC Psychology, 13, 859. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03177-y

Liu, S., Yin, H., Wang, Y., & Lu, J. (2024). Teacher innovation: Conceptualizations, methodologies, and theoretical framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, 104611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104611

Lu, C., Xu, Z., & Tian, Q. (2025). Teachers’ well-being and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation model of perceived insider status and principal authentic leadership. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101419

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human Motivation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Setyaningrum, R., Taufiqulloh, & Habibi, B. (2024). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dan motivasi kerja terhadap perilaku inovatif guru SMA. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 3827–3839. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1477

Siregar, J., Widodo, W., Permana, R., Sriyono, H., & Saputro, A. (2026). Evoking teachers’ innovative work behavior: Perspective of digital leadership, creativity, and proactive personality through work engagement. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.15.1.323

Sofwan, M., Habibi, A., Attar, R. W., Alqahtani, T. M., Alahmari, S. A., & Alhazmi, A. H. (2024). Factors affecting teachers’ behavior of innovative teaching with technology: Structural equation modelling. Sustainability, 16(19), 8496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198496

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Umalihayati, Fajari, L. E. W., Mutoharoh, Nuryati, & Ma’arif, M. (2026). Leadership for innovation in digital teaching: A meta-analysis review of principals’ influence on teachers’ innovative work behavior. Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i1.19714

Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement BT - Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang, Eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08