Developing a Leadership Content Knowledge Model for Madrasah Principals to Strengthen the Madrasah Literacy Movement

Mahrus Mahrus; Agus  Maimun; Indah Aminatuz  Zuhriyah; Zubdatul  Itqon

doi:10.55352/mudir.v8i2.3382

Authors

Mahrus Mahrus Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Agus Maimun Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Indah Aminatuz Zuhriyah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Zubdatul Itqon STAI Nahdlatul Ulama Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v8i2.3382

Keywords:

Leadership Content Knowledge, Madrasah Principal, Madrasah Literacy Movement, Educational Leadership, Multi-Case Study

Abstract

The Madrasah Literacy Movement (MLM) is a strategic initiative designed to foster literacy culture, enhance students' critical thinking skills, and improve the quality of learning in Islamic schools. However, previous studies indicate that the success of the movement largely depends on the leadership capacity of madrasah principals. Existing research has predominantly examined transformational, instructional, and distributed leadership, while limited attention has been given to Leadership Content Knowledge (LCK) as a knowledge-based leadership framework for strengthening the Madrasah Literacy Movement. This study aims to develop a Leadership Content Knowledge model for madrasah principals to strengthen the Madrasah Literacy Movement. Employing a qualitative multi-case study design, the research was conducted at MA Almaarif Singosari, Malang Regency, and MA Muhammadiyah 1 Malang City. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observations, and document analysis involving principals, vice principals, literacy team coordinators, teachers, and institutional documents. Data were analyzed using within-case and cross-case analysis through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while credibility was established through source, technique, and time triangulation. The findings reveal that madrasah principals' Leadership Content Knowledge is developed through the integration of leadership, pedagogical, curricular, organizational, and literacy knowledge, which is operationalized in strategic policy-making, teacher capacity building, literacy culture development, stakeholder collaboration, and continuous evaluation. This study proposes a Leadership Content Knowledge Model for Madrasah Principals that explains the dynamic relationship between knowledge-based leadership competencies, implementation processes, and the strengthening of the Madrasah Literacy Movement. The proposed model extends the theoretical discourse on Leadership Content Knowledge within the context of Islamic education while offering practical implications for strengthening educational leadership in madrasahs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

Beswick, K. (2026). Principals’ Leadership Content Knowledge in STEM Contexts. British Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70010

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report

Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005

Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Cham: Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-15533-3

Hallinger, P., S. Liu, and L. Chen. (2025). “ Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review, 1989–2024.” European Journal of Education 60, no. 4: e70199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70199.

Hallinger, P., S. Liu., Nee Aung, P., and Yan, M. (2025).” A systematic review of instructional leadership research conducted with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS), 1983–2024.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251358575

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). New York: Doubleday.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004423

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yel, T., & Kazak, E. (2025). Examining the Relationship Between School Administrators’ Instructional Leadership and Organizational Learning According to Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 13(2), 1178-1218. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1625406

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.