Developing Student Academic Ability Using Scaffolding Method In Cognitive Apprenticeship Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v5i1.42Keywords:
learning process, cognitive apprenticeship model, scaffolding methodAbstract
The goal of this study is to examine how the Cognitive Apprenticeship Model and the Scaffolding Method are used in math instruction and to assess how well math instruction performs when the two approaches are used together. This research technique is library research, and the papers using the Cognitive Apprenticeship Model and the Scaffolding Method are the data sources. In order to determine whether the scaffolding method and the theory of the cognitive apprenticeship model are appropriate for use in the process of teaching mathematics, the data analysis approach employs the content analysis method. The results of the data analysis show that the cognitive apprenticeship model combined with the scaffolding method is not perceived to be better. This is because the scaffolding contained in the Cognitive Apprenticeship Model step is quite clear. Without having to use the scaffolding method, assistance can be provided in stages by using the sequencing components contained in the cognitive apprenticeship model.
References
Cahyono, A. N. (2010). Vygotskian Perspective: The Scaffolding Process to Reach the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) of Students in Learning Mathematics. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika.
Astuti, E. D., Tannady, H., Lahiya, A., Supriatna, D., & Handayani, E. S. (2023). The Analysis of Relationship Between Quality of Graduates and Education Financing Management in Private Islamic School. Journal on Education, 5(3), 7715-7720.
Candra, C. et al. (2018). Implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach in Mathematics Learning. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (Sesiomadika).
Gunawan. (2014). Increased Understanding of Mathematical Concepts with the Application of Constructivism-Based Mathematical Learning. Skripsi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Hasratudin. (2014). Character-Based Learning of Mathematics Now and in the Future. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 2(1).
Kamaruddin, I., Tannady, H., & Aina, M. (2023). The efforts to improve children’s motoric ability by utilizing the role of traditional games. Journal on Education, 5(3), 9736-9740.
Nugroho, B. S., Anggreni, M. A., Afnanda, M., Arta, D. N. C., & Tannady, H. (2023). The Role of Academic Fraud as an Intervening Variable in Relationship of Determinant Factors Student Ethical Attitude. Journal on Education, 5(3), 9584-9593.
Parinussa, J. D., Taryana, T., Ningtyas, A. A., Rachman, R. S., & Tannady, H. (2023). Developing Student Emotional Intelligence by Involving the Active Role of Teacher. Journal on Education, 5(3), 8528-8533.
Ramli, A., Sudadi, S., & Afendi, A. R. (2023). Evaluation implementation curriculum in productive SMK Negeri 1 Samarinda. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 1-16.
Rachmad, Y. E., Agnesiana, B., Sukmawati, E., Ramli, A., & Zebua, R. S. Y. (2023). The Analysis of Parenting Patterns in Instilling Morals of Early Childhood. Journal of Childhood Development, 3(1), 13-21.
Iis, H. (2007). Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR). Didaktis, 5(3).
Rohaeti, E. E. (2012). Analysis of Learning the Essential Concepts of Middle School Mathematics Through the Socratic Contextual Approach. Infinity, 2(1).
Santoso, Y. R. (2010). Vygotsky's theory and its implications for learning mathematics. Widya Warta, 2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mudir : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
