Blended Assesment Dalam Pembelajaran Fikih Untuk Menilai Aspek Kognitif Peserta Didik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55352/mudir.v1i1.6Keywords:
Blended assessment; cognitive; fikih; syafahi; tahriri; capstone project.Abstract
Assessment has a very vital role in learning process. In Jurisprudence learning many teachers focus on written cognitive assessment, where results become a matter of pride, teachers often forget to assess student understanding, practice and creativity, even though 21st century assessment demands the latest knowledge and abilities. This article uses a blended assessment (tahriri, syafahi, and capstone project) as an alternative solution to cognitive assessment, the assessment of fiqh learning will be comprehensive and make the product of learning. This article includes a literature study with a qualitative-descriptive approach. The result is blended assessment is a combination of two or more types of assessments, to determine students' abilities and improve the quality of learning. Blended assessment in fiqh learning cognitive aspects, has a level, that tahriri test consisting of C1 and C2, functioning to assess memory skills and comprehension, syafahi test consists of C3 and C4, functioning to assess applicative and analytical abilities, and capstone projects consisting of C5 and C6, to assess the evaluation skills and creations of students. The method of evaluation by combining results of tahriri, syafahi, and capstone projects, the percentage is 30 percent tahriri, 30 percent syafahi, and 40 percent capstone project. Three tests are combined into one with the percentage and value of each test result.
References
Angelo & Cross, Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Bass Publishers, 1993.
Barnett and Francis, “Using Higher Order Thinking Questions to Foster Critical Thinking: a Classroom Study”, International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 4, (Desember 2012).
Basuki, Ismet. & Hariyanto, Penilaian Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda. 2014
Bloom and Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, 1957.
Boud & Faclchikov, “Aligning Assessment With Long-Term Learning”, Journal Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 4, (2006): 399-413.
Chard, & Tongariro, “ICT Capstone Projects: The Edge of Chaos”, Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology , Vol. 14, No. 1, (2010): 36-48.
Dann, “Assessment as Learning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice”, Journal Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 21, No. 2, (2014): 149.
Davis, “The Influence of Interlocutor Proficiency in a Paired Oral Assessment”, Journal of Language Testing, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2009): 367–396.
Depdiknas RI, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2003.
Depdiknas, Rencana Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2008.
Dillon & Gushrowski, “Genres and the Web is the Home Page the First Digital Genre?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51, No. 2, (2000): 202-205.
Erdol , Tuba Acar. & Hulya, “Classroom Assessment Practices of Teachers in Turkey”, International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 3, (Juli 2018): 587-602.
Guskey, Thomas. “Closing Achievement: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s Learning For Mastery”, Jurnal Advanced Academica, Vol. 19, No. 1, (November 2007): 1-16.
Hanson & Freewood, Developing a Methodology for Online Feedback and Assessment, Paper presented at the Fifth International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, United Kingdom, 2001.
Heriansyah, “Evaluasi Pembelajaran Fikih dalam Mengembangkan Toleransi Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak”, Jurnal Tarbawi Khatulistiwa, Vol.2 No. 2, (2016): 45.
Houston, Don. and James, “Blending Formative and Summative Assessment in a Capstone Subject: It’s Not Your Tools, it’s How You Use Them”, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol. 14, No. 3, (April, 2017): 1-13.
Irfan, “Importance of Assessment in ELT”, Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 6, No. 9, (September 2018): 163-167.
Janier, Josefina. & Afza Bt Shafie, “Blended Assessment: A Strategy for Classroom Management”, The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 9, No. 1, ( 2018): 8.
Kementerian Agama RI, Peraturan Menteri Agama RI, No. 000912 Tahun 2013: Tentang Kurikulum Madrasah 2013 Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Bahasa Arab. Jakarta: MENAG RI, 2013.
Kunandar, Penilaian Autentik Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Kusaeri, Acuan dan Teknik Proses dan Hasil Belajar Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruqq Media, 2014.
Lewis, Norman. The New Roget’s Thesaurus in Dictionary Form. USA: Barkly Publishing, 1992.
Lichtenberg, Portnoy, Bebeau, Nelson, Rubin, and Kaslow, “Challenges To The Assessment Of Competence And Competencies”, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 38, No. 5, (2007): 474-478.
Linn and Miller, Measurement and Assessment. USA: New Jersey, 2005.
Mann & Smith, “Role of the development methodology and prototyping within capstone projects”, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (2004): 243-249.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI, Permendikbud RI Nomor 23 Tahun 2016, Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan, didundangkan tanggal 17 Juni 2016, 2.
Muslih, Muslih. “Pembelajaran Ayat-Ayat Kawniyah Di SMA Trensains 2 Pesantren Tebuireng Jombang.” ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 12, no. 2 (March 3, 2018): 455–480.
Muslih, Muslih. Implementasi pembelajaran al-Qur'an Hadits berbasis pendidikan karakter di MAN Babat Lamongan. Diss. IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2012.
Muttaqin, Mochamad Zaenal. dan Kusaeri, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tes Tertulis Bentuk Uraian Untuk Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Masalah Materi Fiqih”, Jurna Tatsqif, Vol. 15, No. 1, (Juni 2017).
M, Eugene F. A Study of Blended Assessment Techniques in On-line Testing, AISHE Conference 2007 Teaching and Learning in the Changing World of Higher Education 30-31 Augustus 2007, Ireland.
Nataliarydz & Paula D. James, “The Evolution And Value Of Bleeding Assessment Tools”, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol. 10, No. 11, (2012): 2223–2229.
Picciano, Anthony G. “Blending With Purpose: With Multimodal Model”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 13, No. 1, (2011): 1-8.
Popham, The truth about testing: An educator’s call to action. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.
Purwanto, Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya, 2004.
Qu, Guangzhi. and Lunjin Lu, “A Study on Blended Learning Assessment Methods for Laboratory Intensive Courses Teaching”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 2, No. 6, (Desember 2012): 603-607.
Reeves, “Alternative Assessment Approaches for Learning Environments in Higher Education”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, (2000): 101-111.
Rohamdi, Syamsul Huda. Pengmebangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Yogyakarta: Araska, 2013.
R, Krathwohl, D. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”, Journal College of Education, The Ohio State University, Vol. 41, No. 4, (2002): 112-116.
Sudaryono, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.
Sudino, Konstruksi dan Analisis Tes Suatu Pengantar Kepada Teori Tes dan Pengukuran. Jakarta: P2LPTK, 2007.
Sudjana, Nana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 1989.Sunarti dan Selly, Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013: Membantu Guru dan Calon Guru Mengetahui Langkah-langkah Penilaian Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2014.Suriadi, “Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Fikih”, Mu’allimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Vol. 3, No. 1, (Oktober 2017): 1-11.
Suskie, Linda. Assessing student learning. Bolton: Anker Publishing Company,2004.
Suwandi, Model-Model Penilaian Dalam Pembelajaran. Surakarta: Yupa Pustaka, 2010.
Syamsu, Pradi Khusufi. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor”, Jurnal El- Ibtikar, Vol 7, No. 2 (Desember 2018): 18-40.
Taras, “Assessment Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 53, No. 4, (2005): 466-478.
Todd and Magleby, “Elements of a Successful Capstone Course Considering the Needs of Stakeholders”. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, (2005), 203-214.
Viswanathan, Shekar. “Implementation Of Effective Capstone Projects In Undergraduate Manufacturing Design Engineering Program”, American Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, (Juni 2007): 45-60.
Wagenaar, “The Capstone Course”, Journal of Teaching Sociology, Vol. 21, No. 3, (2003):209-214.
Zakaria, Penilaian Sikap. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mudir : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
